Study finds many pediatric emergency CT requests may be inappropriate
Researchers found that 54% of completed pediatric emergency CT requests for neurological indications were “usually not appropriate” under ACR criteria. Nearly 25% of requests lacked enough clinical information to judge appropriateness.

More than half of completed pediatric emergency CT requests for neurological indications may not align with American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria, according to research published in Emergency Radiology.
Researchers reviewed 462 CT requests submitted in the emergency department of an Italian pediatric hospital. The study assessed requests against the pediatric panel of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
Complete CT requests were available in 348 cases. Of those, 54% were rated “usually not appropriate,” 29.9% were rated “may be appropriate,” and 16.1% were rated “usually appropriate.”
Nearly 25% of the 462 requests had incomplete or ambiguous clinical information. More than 43% of headache-related cases lacked enough clinical detail, the authors noted.
Inappropriate CT requests were most common in seizure cases, at 87.1%. They were also reported in 57.7% of headache cases and 41.7% of head trauma cases.
The authors cautioned that pediatric CT overuse can be especially consequential because children have higher sensitivity to radiation and longer expected lifespans after exposure. They described diagnostic imaging appropriateness as a “key performance indicator” for patient safety.
Fear of missing critical findings may partly explain the high rate of inappropriate exams, according to the study authors. They said defensive medicine remains a common challenge, particularly in emergency department settings.
Suggested interventions included better communication between emergency clinicians and radiology teams, along with more complete clinical information in imaging requests.
The authors also acknowledged limitations, including that 1 trainee operator evaluated requests against the ACR criteria and that the analysis did not review CT exams performed after the requests were submitted.
About the author
RadiologySignal.com writersEditorial Team
Radiology Signal Staff covers developments across medical imaging, radiology AI, imaging informatics, clinical research, and radiology business. The team monitors primary sources, peer-reviewed studies, company announcements, society updates, and healthcare industry news to deliver concise reporting for imaging professionals.
More from this section

Tennessee probes Premier Radiology after fatal MRI incident
Tennessee health authorities are investigating a patient’s death after an MRI at a Premier Radiology outpatient facility in Brentwood. The investigation is focused on MRI safety procedures, cardiac device handling, and staff training on emergency equipment.

Estate seeks to revive radiology malpractice suit in Florida
Attorneys for Jennifer Palmer’s estate are asking the Florida SC to revive a malpractice suit against Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and 2 New York physicians.

Triad Radiology reports email-related data security incident
Triad Radiology Associates said an employee email account may have exposed protected health information and personal data. The HHS breach portal lists the incident as affecting 11,011 individuals.